Context-Seeking Conversational AI for Health Information Navigation
google · Healthcare · 2025 · source Agentic: yes · promotional bias: low · source-backed · extracted with prompt 0.5.6 (schema v2)
Generated from extraction.json — do not edit by hand. Every claim cites verbatim source evidence; stated means the quote directly asserts the claim, implied means it supports it indirectly.
Problem
Domain: Health information navigation
Google Research wanted to move health-information AI beyond passive one-shot answering. Users often cannot articulate medically relevant context, and generic answers can feel overwhelming or impersonal, so the prototype needed to ask clarifying questions while still providing useful information safely.
Constraints:
- Health information is sensitive and must be tailored without asking users to share identifying information.
- Users may not know which details are medically relevant.
- Clarifying questions can reduce ambiguity but hurt engagement if poorly written or hidden in long answers.
- The design needed comparison against a baseline Gemini model in user studies.
- The system was an early-stage research prototype rather than a clinical decision tool.
Architecture
Google built a Gemini-based Wayfinding AI that asks targeted clarifying questions, provides best-effort answers at each turn, explains how new user context changes the answer, and presents conversation/questions separately from detailed explanations in a two-column interface.
Diagram confidence: explicit (topology described by the source).
flowchart LR health-user["Health user"] --> wayfinding-ai["Wayfinding AI"] wayfinding-ai --> clarifying-question-loop["Clarifying-question loop"] clarifying-question-loop --> health-user wayfinding-ai --> best-effort-answer-pane["Best-effort answer pane"] wayfinding-ai --> transparent-reasoning-explainer["Transparent reasoning explainer"] best-effort-answer-pane --> two-column-interface["Two-column interface"] transparent-reasoning-explainer --> two-column-interface clarifying-question-loop --> two-column-interface
Components
| Component | Role | Interacts with |
|---|---|---|
Health user |
Asks a health-related question and supplies contextual answers to clarifying questions. | Wayfinding AI |
Wayfinding AI |
Gemini-based prototype that guides the health conversation with clarifying questions and best-effort answers. | Health user, Clarifying-question loop, Best-effort answer pane, Transparent reasoning explainer |
Clarifying-question loop |
Asks up to three targeted questions per turn to elicit relevant context. | Wayfinding AI, Health user |
Best-effort answer pane |
Provides useful information at every turn while making clear that answers can improve with more context. | Wayfinding AI, Two-column interface |
Transparent reasoning explainer |
Explains how newly supplied user context changes or refines the answer. | Wayfinding AI, Two-column interface |
Two-column interface |
Separates interactive conversation and clarifying questions from detailed informational content. | Clarifying-question loop, Best-effort answer pane, Transparent reasoning explainer |
Data flow
A user brings a health question. The Wayfinding AI gives a best-effort answer from currently shared context, asks up to three targeted questions to reduce ambiguity, incorporates the user's answers into the next turn, and explains how the latest context refined the previous answer.
Why this architecture
The design mirrors expert wayfinding: ask context-seeking questions before pretending to know the user's goals, while still giving interim value. The two-column UI addresses the practical problem that questions get missed when embedded in long answer text.
Models used: Gemini · Gemini 2.5 Flash baseline
Scale
- The overall research involved four mixed-method studies and 163 participants.“In a series of four mixed-method user experience studies with a total of 163 participants, we examined how people interact with AI for their health questions”article, stated
- The formative research interviewed 33 participants.“we interviewed 33 participants about their experiences finding health information online.”article, stated
- The randomized user study used 130 US-based participants.“we conducted a randomized user study with 130 US-based participants recruited via a third party platform.”article, stated
- For symptom-cause topics, Wayfinding conversations averaged 4.96 turns versus 3.29 for baseline.“conversations with the Wayfinding AI had 4.96 turns on average, compared to 3.29 for the baseline AI.”article, stated
Alternatives considered (roads not taken)
Passive one-shot question answering
Rejected because: It gives a comprehensive answer before understanding the user's context or goals.
Deferred-answer only
Rejected because: Some health questions may not need clarification, so the system gives best-effort answers at every turn.
Put clarifying questions inside long answers
Rejected because: Questions can be missed when buried in detailed answer text.
Patterns
prompt-chaining (workflow)
The agent repeatedly asks clarifying questions and refines later answers based on new context.
eval-driven-development (evaluation)
The prototype was iteratively designed and tested through formative interviews and randomized user studies.
structured-output-contract (output)
The two-column interface separates questions, conversation, answers, and explanations into predictable regions.
Tradeoffs
Ask clarifying questions before finalizing an answer
Chose context-seeking conversation over immediate comprehensive answer only.
Rationale: The approach better discovers user needs and produces more tailored information.
Provide a best-effort answer at every turn
Chose interim usefulness plus follow-up questions over withholding answers until all clarification is complete.
Rationale: Users still get immediate value while retaining the option to improve the answer through more context.
Use a two-column interface
Chose separated conversation/questions and answer/explanation panes over one long mixed chat response.
Rationale: Separation prevents clarifying questions from being missed inside long informational text.
Gotchas (what bit them)
Users often do not know how to formulate medically useful queries.
Root cause: Without clinical background, they may not know which details matter.
Resolution: Ask targeted clarifying questions to help users articulate their situation.
Question-asking can hurt engagement if executed poorly.
Root cause: Poorly formulated or hidden questions are easy to ignore.
Resolution: Limit questions to targeted prompts and separate them visually in the interface.
Evaluation
Google ran formative interviews and a randomized within-subjects study comparing Wayfinding AI with a baseline Gemini 2.5 Flash model.
Metrics: Helpfulness · Relevance of questions · Tailoring · Goal understanding · Ease of use · Efficiency · Future preference · Conversation turns
Outcomes
- Participants preferred Wayfinding AI across helpfulness, relevance, goal understanding, and tailoring.
- Wayfinding AI produced longer conversations for symptom-cause topics.
- The research supports context-seeking agents for health-information navigation.
The research included 163 participants overall and a randomized study with 130 US-based participants.